ContentWise Blog

From Web to Print: User-Generated Magazines

JPG magazineWhile most of us are focused on moving print publications to the Web, two Web sites are working in the opposite direction.

JPG, a photo site, and Everywhere, which covers travel, gather user-generated material in order to create slick glossy magazines in print.

Both sites are owned by 8020 Publishing, which is backed by Halsey Minor, founder of CNET. Not only is 8020’s production process going contrary to most, it expects to make its money primarily from subscription revenue and to “limit advertising.”

The publisher’s trend-bucking model, described fully in last week’s New York Times, is an experiment worth watching.

Perfecting the Paragraph

Here are the keys to well-built paragraphs:

  • A paragraph should have only one point.
  • Structure a paragraph to leave the reader with the take-away message.
  • Build each sentence on the previous one.

In a recent workshop on writing and editing, we discussed how to apply these rules to some excerpts from magazine articles. Please download our paragraph structure handout (a PDF document).
Download PDF: Paragraph StructurePDF download

The Well-Structured Sentence

Great articles are built of great sentences. Here’s some assembly advice from a recent editing workshop we presented for a client:

  • A sentence should have only one point.
  • Structure a sentence to orient and cue the reader.
  • Structure sentences to emphasize what you mean to emphasize.

You can see these rules in action by checking out our handout on sentence structure (a PDF document). It includes annotated excerpts from magazine articles
Download PDF: Sentence StructurePDF download

Four Mistakes Web Sites Still Make, And How to Fix Them

Next month at Stanford’s Publishing on the Web Conference, we’ll be giving a talk titled “10 Mistakes Web Sites Still Make—And How to Fix Them.”

At the conference we’ll go into lots of details, show before-and-after screenshots, and answer participants’ questions. As an appetizer, we offer this brief rundown of four of the 10 mistakes—in increasing order of importance.

#4: Squandered Vertical Space
Oversized elements hog the top of the page, pushing what’s most important “below the fold,” where it is invisible unless users scroll down. Here’s the scary news: An awful lot of site visitors simply do not scroll down.

Solution: Keep logos, banner graphics, display copy, and other top-of-page elements shallow. Don’t waste vertical space on non-informational “theme art” and low-value text blocks such as “Welcome!” messages.

#3: Unconventional Navigation
“Creative” schemes that stray from Web conventions force users to learn—or guess at—the new rules. Many will give up quickly; others won’t bother to try.

Solution: Avoid barnyard maps, orbiting planets, and other such “concept navigation.” Use familiar formats such as text within tabs or buttons, and place the nav at the top or left side of the page. Make sure text links are recognizable as “clickable” by using a single, unique color and, to eliminate all doubt, underline the link. Resist the urge to invent Flash-driven widgets to perform tasks such as scrolling and linking, for which there are straightforward and well-known routines.

#2: Un-Webified Text
Long columns of dense, grey, unformatted text are hard to digest and painful to read on computer screens—just the opposite of what impatient, mission-oriented scanners are looking for.

Solution: Shorten all print-derived text drastically. Carve long pieces into bite-sized sections labeled with clear headings, and provide top-of-page “document navigation” to the sections. Help scanners grab information at a glance by highlighting key text with bullets, bold type, and links. And put the bottom-line information at the top. (See an example of how to rework a text article for the Web.)

#1: The Dump
The site looks and acts like a magazine that’s been dumped on to the Web—a serious mismatch of message and medium.

Solution: Rather than aping the print publication’s setup using categories such as “cover story,” “volume and number,” and magazine-specific departments, organize the site around the Web audience’s areas of interest. Rewrite “clever” headlines and decks in a more straightforward style.

Above all, a magazine Web site needs to make the leap from inert print content to interactive tools and experiences. By carving up, indexing, and feeding its print-based content into databases, a site can offer useful related material, custom Web feeds and alerts, flexible browsing and searching of archives, personalized presentation of pages, and “power tools” such as recipe finders and product selectors.

Confused About a Word? Check “Confusing Words”

Editor’s pop quiz: When do you use "lie" rather than "lay"? What about "capital" as opposed to "capitol"? Here’s a particularly worrisome pair: affluent and effluent.

Confusing Words is a handy online tool for sorting out these and 3,200 more words that are "troublesome to readers and writers." With simple definitions and illuminating examples of correct usage, it’s like a digital Strunk & White. (Or maybe you think that should that be, "…its like a digital Strunk & White." Check the site to be sure.)

Keep Tabs on Cool Tech: CoolSW

It’s nearly impossible for mere editors and publishers to keep up with the never-ending flow of new sites and services on the Web. One solution: Let the crowd point the way.

Intel just unveiled a Digg-style site that lists the most promising new tools and startups, based on the voting of its tech-savvy audience. It’s called CoolSW (for "cool software").

CoolSW had been an internal site that Intel employees used to track and rank emerging technologies, according to the full story at Wired Tech Biz. Glad they decided to share.

Promote Content With Clear Headlines & Social Links

It’s not enough to simply publish content on the Web and hope that the audience will come. You have to work the system.

Writing at Poynter Online, Managing Editor Mark Russell of the Orlando Sentinel shares some strategies that work for his newspaper’s site:

1. Write Web-friendly headlines that are readily picked up by search engines and clicked on by searchers. This means using quick, informative, concrete language. Some recent examples from the Sentinel’s site:

  • Kidnapped teen’s dad: ‘Watch your children’
  • 10 held, 3 at large in cocaine roundup
  • Polk residents can recycle tires, phones, ink cartridges

It also means avoiding the clever turns of phrases that may amuse your colleagues but leave the Web audience scratching its collective head. For instance, "Commission to dive in on pool." Oops–that was a rare instance of The Sentinel ignoring its own advice.

2. Submit article links to social recommendation & networking sites. Russell describes two recent cases in which the paper attracted considerable attention for local stories by putting links to them on Facebook.

Newspapers Showing the Way From Print to Web?

As if to prove that the Washington Post‘s multi-platform strategies are the way to go, the latest Nielsen//Net Ratings show that visits to newspaper Web sites rose 7.7 percent in the second quarter of this year, compared to the same period in 2006. Experts interviewed by Media Life attribute that growth to the current push by papers to make their sites into multimedia town halls–that is, to give the reader something well beyond the print experience.

Even so, the online revenue model remains elusive, as demonstrated by the New York Times‘ rumored decision to drop its subscription service, TimesSelect.

Washington Post Explores New “Digital Avenues”

“If circulation is dropping,” says Washington Post sports reporter Barry Svrluga, “and we’re trying to figure out how people are going to get their news, who am I to say no to trying out new avenues?”

That sentiment is increasingly expressed by writers, editors, and publishers scrambling to move beyond their traditional print platforms–or at least it should be.

Svrluga’s multi-platform activities (breaking news Web blurbs pounded out at the nearest Starbucks, online chats with readers, blogging, podcasts, and, oh yes, articles for the newspaper) are described in a terrific analysis by Fortune magazine writer Marc Gunther of the Post’s aggressive exploration of digital avenues.

Anyone feeling the push to get beyond print—and who isn’t?—will find the Post’s “platform-agnostic” survival strategies useful.

‘Time Spent’–a Better Metric of Web Engagement?

Nielsen/NetRatings is changing the way it measures audience engagement on Web sites. It is replacing visitors’ page views with total time spent on a site.

“‘Total Minutes’ is the best engagement metric in this initial stage of Web 2.0 development, not only because it ensures fair measurement of Web sites using RIA [rich Internet applications such as AJAX] and streaming media [audio, video, data tickers, etc.], but also of Web environments that have never been well-served by the page view, such as online gaming and Internet applications,” said Scott Ross, director, productmarketing for the NetView service. (See Nielsen’s press release.)

On the other hand…

Blogger Scott Karp (Publishing 2.0) offers a cogent summary of why “total minutes” may be an imperfect metric.